luck & risk

i’m trying to understand this

and my brain doesn’t like it.


because if outcomes aren’t proof,

then what is?


my parents bought houses.

rates went up.

they lost money.


i called it stupid.


but now i’m reading this

and it’s saying

maybe it wasn’t stupidity.


maybe it was risk

meeting bad timing.


and i hate that idea.


because that means

you can do something reasonable

and still lose.


that means effort isn’t a guarantee.


that means the world isn’t clean.


i always thought

if you’re smart enough

disciplined enough

aware enough


you win.


but what if you just increase your odds?


what if you can’t eliminate randomness?


what if i’ve been judging outcomes

like they’re moral verdicts?


and if that’s true—


what happens when i lose?


am i stupid?

or just exposed?


what happens when i win?


am i brilliant?

or just aligned with the wind?


risk is chosen.

luck is not.


but once you choose risk,

you invite luck to the table.


and that’s what’s messing with me.


because i want control.


i want causality.


i want clean equations.


but the world doesn’t run on clean equations.


and i don’t fully know

how to feel about that yet. 


— Mr. Mak


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

back when we were kids

lonely at the top

The Surge and 5 Navels