luck & risk
i’m trying to understand this
and my brain doesn’t like it.
because if outcomes aren’t proof,
then what is?
my parents bought houses.
rates went up.
they lost money.
i called it stupid.
but now i’m reading this
and it’s saying
maybe it wasn’t stupidity.
maybe it was risk
meeting bad timing.
and i hate that idea.
because that means
you can do something reasonable
and still lose.
that means effort isn’t a guarantee.
that means the world isn’t clean.
i always thought
if you’re smart enough
disciplined enough
aware enough
you win.
but what if you just increase your odds?
what if you can’t eliminate randomness?
what if i’ve been judging outcomes
like they’re moral verdicts?
and if that’s true—
what happens when i lose?
am i stupid?
or just exposed?
what happens when i win?
am i brilliant?
or just aligned with the wind?
risk is chosen.
luck is not.
but once you choose risk,
you invite luck to the table.
and that’s what’s messing with me.
because i want control.
i want causality.
i want clean equations.
but the world doesn’t run on clean equations.
and i don’t fully know
how to feel about that yet.
— Mr. Mak
Comments
Post a Comment